Tag Archives: live

Web media push for online presidential debate

Ten. That’s the number of candidates running for the French presidency, and the problem of finding a way for all of them to debate together may find a solution online. 

A televised debate on France 2 show “Mots Croisés”  will take place on the 16th of April, but organizing it is harder said than done. François Bayrou insists it is public broadcasting’s role to do so, and smaller candidates like Jacques Cheminade and Nathalie Arthaud said they would come. But Nicolas Sarkozy’s campaign only wants a second round debate, François Hollande is still hesitating and Marine Le Pen will come…only if the latter two do.

For an American audience this may be difficult to understand. Didn’t the Republican primaries host a multitude of debates with eight candidates? There are important differences that make it hard to repeat the experience here. All the primary candidates were, by definition, Republicans or conservatives, which meant that despite differences between individual candidates, most of them had the same thinking framework. The French presidential election couldn’t be more different (although, amusingly enough, both Newt Gingrich and Jacques Cheminade share a passion for space travel). The ten candidates span the whole political spectrum, from extreme-right to extreme-left, and getting them to debate in a constructive and clear way is an arduous task.

Then why not forget the smaller candidates that are barely polling in single digits and focus on the main four or five? asks my fictional American audience. In France, CSA regulations (see my previous post for an explanation) make this impossible. All candidates need equal airtime, and favoring candidates is not an option.

This is where the web kicks in. CSA regulations don’t apply to the Internet, so organizing such a debate is legal. It would also allow for a much more flexible organization. These past few days Dailymotion, the Parisien.fr, Europe 1.fr, Yahoo! and the Nouvel Observateur.com have joined forces to do just that. In a common statement they wrote:

“In the face of the innumerable difficulties the traditional media are encountering in trying to organize a debate between the main presidential candidates, and to fulfill the voters’ need for information, Dailymotion, Le Lab Europe 1, Yahoo!, Le Nouvel Observateur.com and LeParisien.fr are joining forces to propose a real debate. […]”

They added that the candidates:

“will be able to challenge each other, exchange and debate without constraints, and will be interviewed by young, experimented and talented journalists as well as by web users via social media.”

The Twitter hashtag #ledébat is the rallying point for these web media, who have started contacting candidates on social media, as you can see below:

Marine Le Pen, Nicolas Dupont Aignan and François Bayrou have already accepted. But while an unrestricted online debate is in the interest of the smaller candidates (as is the televised one, where they get airtime equal to that of their opponents), heavyweights Nicolas Sarkozy and François Hollande are much more reluctant to jump into a ten-man arena. Both already have the second round in sight, and their campaigns don’t want to get bogged down in such an event, online or off.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Televised Tweeting

CC/Flickr/arcticpenguin

You can yell all you want at your television, but no one will answer back, even if French President Nicolas Sarkozy or TF1 anchor Claire Chazal make a mistake during a live interview.

Enter Twitter. You can’t pack millions of spectators into your living room to watch a live presidential interview, but you can tweet about it – and get the corrections you expected in real time. Audiences can now simultaneously watch a political news program and get instant feedback online, enabling them to better analyze and evaluate what is being said on air.

This is the gist of what many journalists and cybernauts are expressing in the aftermath of Sarkozy’s televised interview bonanza last Sunday. Many grumbled at the four interviewers’ lack of fact-checking follow-ups, which enabled the French President to go almost unchallenged during his one-hour, eight-station interview. Corrections of his mistakes and approximations abounded in the press afterwards (watch the full interview at the end of this post).

Twitter, however, is the perfect platform for real-time verification of the many figures and numbers candidates wave around on air. Media outlets, politicians and netizens alike frantically commented Sunday’s interview to defend, criticize or mock the President.

https://twitter.com/Eric_Besson/status/163724025976209409

Take French newspaper Libération‘s Désintox journalists, who picked up on Sarkozy’s false assertion that he had never pronounced the word “TVA social” [“Social VAT”]:

A video quickly followed the next day to confirm their claim:

Vodpod videos no longer available.

So what are we dealing with? There are three events happening simultaneously. First, a television audience that is 17.5 million strong but remains completely passive. Second, an online community that is intensely active in real-time but is small in size (Twitter recently reached 5.2 million subscribers in France, compared to over 100 million in the United States). Third, the interview itself, with a President and four journalists who are completely oblivious to both audiences.

The solution is to merge everything together, according to media blogs and bloggers like Guy Birenbaum at French radio Europe 1:, with live fact-checking done in a way that enables the journalists to counter phony facts on air. He writes:

When will we finally decide to confront interviewed politicians with documents (audio, video, text, sources, links) in real time to show that they spruce up reality or become amnesiac? 

These kind of media events, where spectators, interviewers and desk journalists work in a loop of feedback, are rare, but some are jumping on the bandwagon, like journalism students at the CFJ in Paris who recently partnered with YouTube for the 2012 campaign. The idea is to have two sets of journalists: interviewers who ask the actual questions and fact-checkers who verify information in real-time and pass it back to the interviewers for follow-ups – all of it visible to both television and Internet audiences.

Politicians beware. Soon your live gaffes and slip-ups will be retweeted right back into your faces.

More:

– A University of Illinois at Chicago study on social media and television interaction.

– Sarkozy’s interview:

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,